In this cornerstone of modern liberal social theory, Peter Kropotkin states that the En la práctica de la ayuda mutua, cuyas huellas podemos seguir hasta las. Piotr Kropotkin: La Ayuda Mutua: un factor en la evolución. According to Kropotkin, competition within a species is the rare exception .. de cómo la ayuda mutua es un factor de evolución hcia una sociedad más justa.
|Published (Last):||1 September 2009|
|PDF File Size:||5.90 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.86 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Kropotkin considers the importance of mutual aid for prosperity and survival in the animal kingdom, in indigenous and early European societies, in the Medieval free cities especially through the guildsand in the late 19th kropogkin village, labor movement, and poor folk. And it’s always easier to believe that we do naturally prey on each other and come up with a general rule to explain it. It had its own self-jurisdiction, its own military force, kropotkih own general assemblies, its own traditions of struggles, glory, and independence, its own relations with other guilds of the same trade in other cities; it had, in a word, a full organic life which could only result from the integrality of the vital qyuda.
Open Preview See a Problem?
L’ajuda mútua: un factor en l’evolució
I may do this sometime–but if I had syuda the appendices at once, I wouldn’t have needed to do the labor. Some more history is probably in order, this book was a collection of responses to Thomas Huxley who was the public face of evolution at the time, as Darwin was shy.
The data that Kropotkin utilized came from many different animal species. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
The subsequent chapters trace the history of humanity through a picturesque sequence of snapshots of human collectivism but with a fundamentally libertarian bent. It’s evident that he sometimes found English usages a little inconvenient.
Mutual Aid by Pyotr Kropotkin
Jul 25, Stephie Jane Rexroth rated it it was amazing. He only argued that if competition took place at critical points in life reproduction, childhood, sickness, drought, etcit would have disproportionate effects.
This is the edition I have.
I think we today are a little more used to this idea, but Kropotkin was writing this book during the heyday of Social Darwinism, so I think it was a bolder statement to contemporaries. Even if LeGuin hadn’t specifically muhua that she was beholden to Kropotkin, it would have been easy to figure out, kroppotkin anyone who’d read The Dispossessed.
Kropotkin could only cite sources that were already known including work by his friends not yet published. So I had mild interest in this book.
L’ajuda mútua: un factor en l’evolució – Viquipèdia, l’enciclopèdia lliure
Absolutely oa reading for understanding our battles of ideology and also for understanding the development of scientific understandings of evolution. It’s true that there were cases in quite a few places in which a ‘rich’ person’s property was buried with the deceased, and others where the property was destroyed.
The book predominantly focuses on man’s struggle for existence from the stone age to the dark ages, progressing on to the medieval period and finally ending with the modern times lat A eyeopener in today’s korpotkin drunk with infallibility of individualism-in its narrow terminological sense. Kropotkin goes on to speculate about the survival value of cooperative behavior.
The essence of this book is about how species work together for mutual benefit, despite the Darwinian argument of competition adopted by the capitalist system. Insurrectionary anarchism Platformism Synthesis federations. This book concludes that cooperation and mutual aid are the most important factors ,utua the evolution of the species and the ability to survive.
One of the first advocates of anarchist communism, Kropotkin advocated a communist society free from central government. If he had read more of the works of Boas and his students, for example, he probably wouldn’t have thought that the perversion of the potlatch from a means of redistributing unevenly distributed resources into an orgy of destruction was normal or natural.
Elise and I have watched a lot of nature documentaries over the years, and it struck me while reading this that it was probably the late nineteenth-century equivalent of watching a nature documentary–Kropotkin talks in some detail about the social organization of very many different kinds of animals, enough that you start to build a little picture in your head.
And the need of mutual aid and support which had lately taken refuge in the narrow circle of the family, or the slum neighborhoods, in the village, or the secret union of workers, reasserts itself again, even in our modern society, and claims its rights to be, as it has always been, the chief leader towards further progress. This is an interesting hybrid sort of book.
Good, ’cause that’s about it. But the crafts and guilds really needed to establish such institutions on their own. But the book begins before humanity, as it ought to. The book is a collection of essays, written in a big time span, that were later turn into a book. In fact, one of the issues that Kropotkin doesn’t adequately deal with is that muuta differences between people acculturated into different societies are often greater than the similarities between them.
But there are even better methods in nature. Kropotkin’s work contains a lot of references to 19th century biology, sociology and anthropology. Want to Read saving…. Kropotkin went on many expeditions as a cartographer and naturalist for the Russian government, only to find that this competition was not what dominated what he saw when he observed non-humans and humans interacting.
It’s also not clear how much the book was altered for the edition. What an excellent book. He adopts the method of using existing societies at differing levels of socio-cultural complexity to speculate about the course of human socio-cultural evolution. What also has made this a terrible experience is the quality of the print.
I’ll wager Kropotkin didn’t know the latter. Ok, societies work just as well, no; actually they often work better th When I used to work at Bound Together, an anarchist bookshop in San Francisco, they teased me because I had never read this book by Kropotkin aka the anarchist formerly known as prince.
People who have read more nineteenth-century literature will probably have less problem with this than the average reader, but there would still be some problems. Oct 18, P.