Addendum to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual: Scoring of the EORTC QLQ- CPAL. Mogens Groenvold and Morten Aagaard Petersen on behalf of the. PDF | On Apr 1, , Mogens Groenvold and others published EORTC QLQ- CPAL: The new standard in the assessment of health-related. This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in.
|Published (Last):||1 September 2004|
|PDF File Size:||7.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.78 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
You can help correct errors and omissions. Windows users should not attempt to download these files with a web browser.
European Journal of Cancer. This allows to link your profile to this item. Item response theory methods were used to shorten scales.
If you know of missing items erotc this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. Scoring, organization and item format are different; however, response options and recall period are the same.
RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
Niels Henrik Bruun, Niels Henrik Bruun Aarhus University. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. N2 – This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in oncology, for eoetc care research. European Journal of CancerVol. Each instrument has unique strengths and weaknesses and choice between these tools is dependent on the investigator and study needs.
A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care ‘ European Journal of Cancervol. More about this item Keywords data management ; questionnaire scoring ; Statistics Access and download statistics Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors.
Help us Corrections Found an error or omission? This module should be installed from within Stata by typing “ssc install qlqc15”. European Journal of Cancer42 155 – See general information about how to correct material in RePEc. The purpose of this article was to conduct a review of studies utilizing these two palliative-specific QoL instruments, their development and their relative strengths for use in advanced cancer eoftc.
Download full text from publisher File URL: If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the “citations” tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. A comparison between both questionnaires in terms of development, characteristics, validation and use was conducted. General contact details of provider: Ql-c15-pal tools cover the core items relevant to patients with advanced cancers and can be supplemented with disease-specific tools.
Although significant overlap exists between both tools, there is a marked difference in the aspects of QoL assessed. For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Future studies should directly compare these two tools and validate their use through a number of administration modes.
A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care”.
Corrections All material on this site eogtc been provided by the respective publishers and authors. More about this item Keywords data management ; questionnaire scoring ; Statistics Access and download statistics.
We have no references for this item. Main research site Explore Bristol Research. Depending on the research questions, it may be supplemented by additional items, modules or questionnaires.
QLQC Stata module for scoring of the EORTC QLQ-CPAL
You can help adding them by using this form. The study included interviews with 41 patients and 66 health care professionals in palliative care to determine the appropriateness, relevance and importance of the various domains of the QLQ-C Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services. Shorter quality-of-life QoL assessments are beneficial for palliative patients as they reduce burden associated with completing personal, and at times stressful, qlq-c15-pao.
Important dimensions not covered by the questionnaire were identified. When requesting a correction, please qlq-c5-pal this item’s handle: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care Research output: Four scales were shortened without reducing measurement precision.