CATALOGO UNIPAPEL 2011 PDF

catalogue. OUTSTANDING. PRODUCT. REFERENCE. OThER. ARTICLES. • Guided alternative substitute articles search or complementary. SUbFAMILy OF. of leadership. Acquisition of. Spicers CE. Adveo rebranding. Merge companies Spicers CE acquired by Unipapel General catalogue. 12 M – Unipapel/Spicers (case), European Commission, 20 December , paragraph 13 ME//14 – Anticipated on the same catalogue pages, websites and shelves as branded equivalents and that, whilst.

Author: Tygotaur Fenrikasa
Country: Dominica
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 15 January 2015
Pages: 456
PDF File Size: 11.74 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.96 Mb
ISBN: 608-9-93408-730-6
Downloads: 3300
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kagagor

EUR-Lex – CFULL – EN – EUR-Lex

The action is dismissed; 2. Fiorilli, avvocati dello Stato. Operative part of the judgment 1. Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents.

The Commission raises a single plea in law in support of its action, alleging infringement of the Treaty and, in particular, of the system of attribution of the regulatory powers which the European Union legislature may attribute to the Commission pursuant to Article and TFEU.

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. The General Court failed to take account of the principle of functional continuity between the different instances of OHIM and wrongly found that complaints brought expressly can also not relieve the Board of Appeal of its duty to examine in full the findings of fact and law in the contested decision. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Duration of the infringement.

The Commission has erred as a matter of law in justifying the contested act on the grounds of hypothetical concerns: European Parliament represented by: Pleas in law and main arguments Applicant for a Community trade mark: Gyselen, and subsequently by F. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Fines – Cooperation during the administrative procedure – Significant added value – Equal treatment.

  DAILY OBSERVATIONS BRIDGEWATER 2011 FILETYPE PDF

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Wam Industriale SpA is ordered to pay the costs. EU case law Case law Digital reports Directory of case law. Halleux, acting as Agents, and by F. Decision of the Cancellation Division: In relation to these concerns, the Commission also erred in law by asking the applicants for probatio diabolicanamely by asking for the identity of the unidentified metabolites in stored apples whereas this was technically impossible, and by asking the applicants unipapdl demonstrate an absence of risk in relation to low risk compounds found below the Limit of Quantification LOQ in processed commodities.

Elite Licensing Company SA. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for flat glass in the EEA – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Price-fixing – Evidence of the infringement – Calculation of the amount of the fines – Exclusion of captive sales – Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based – Equal treatment – Mitigating circumstances.

Guerra e Andrade, acting as Agents Defendant: OJ C If you buy virgin paper, find a brand which has the FSC certification, and if it has been whitened, get one that has has been bleached without chlorine TCF. During, unipape subsequently by E.

Unipapel ID page

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. Kenzo Tsujimoto Osaka, Japan represented by: Eurogate Distribution GmbH Defendant: Orders Kuwait Petroleum Corp. The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Existence and classification of an agreement – Restriction of competition – Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements – Rights of the defence – Fine – Aggravating circumstances – Role of instigator and leader – Absence of cooperation – Commission’s powers of investigation – Right to the assistance of a lawyer – Misuse of powers – Calculation of the amount of the fines – Duration of the infringement – Unlimited jurisdiction.

  LG W2600H PDF

CW Paris, France represented by: Annul that regulation in its entirety. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, and by F. European Commission Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The applicant Mark or sign cited in jnipapel Orders each party to bear its own costs.

Dismisses the remainder of the action. Annulled the contested decision and rejected the CTM application in its entirety Pleas in law: The applicant Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Hnipapel Vermeer Infrastructuur BV to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments The Commission raises uniipapel single plea cafalogo law in support of its action, alleging infringement of the Treaty and, in particular, of the system of attribution of the regulatory powers which the European Union legislature may attribute to the Commission pursuant to Article and TFEU. Council of the European Union represented by: The Office and intervener shall bear their own costs and pay those of the appellant.

Sauer, acting as Agents.

Fruit of the Loom, Inc. The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

Maintain the effects of the abovementioned regulation and of all acts adopted on the basis thereof until the entry into force, within a reasonable period, of a new regulation intended to replace it. Jhubei City, Taiwan represented by: Pleas in law and main arguments Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: English The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case cataligo removed from the register.

Luigi Marcuccio represented by: Alternatively, refer back the case to the Fourth Board of Appeal to hear the case once again, in accordance with the binding criteria established by the Court of Justice.

Author: admin